 |
| 1: | OOIDA submitted by OOIDA The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association is the international trade association representing the interests of independent owner-operators... |
|
|  |
Welcome Expediters and Guests to our World of Expediting.Our Expediter Forum is the all year around meeting place, where Expediters come for Information or discuss expediting related questions. It does not matter if you expedite with a Tractor/Trailer, Expediter Straight Truck or Expediter Van, you are very welcome here in Expediter World. We bring you Expediting and Trucking News almost every day. Expediter Professionals as well as Expediter Newbie’s enjoy our Expediter Photo Gallery, Expediters Classifieds or have a Live Chat with other expediting Forum Members. We are sure you will recognize our forum to have one of the friendliest atmospheres of any forum in the industry. Enjoy and have fun in ExpediterWorld |
|
|
New story!!!
Western Express Shirks Responsibility
When all else has failed, let EW assist you with a resolution to your truck equipment problems.
We will attempt to reach a resolution with the parties involved on your behalf. |
|
|
|
$40 million in grants available for drivers operating in CA trade corridors
|
Thousands of owner-operators who run through California’s four major
trade corridors may be eligible for a diesel engine grant program
that’s part of the state’s billion dollar Goods Movement Emission
Reduction Program.
The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution
Control District will accept applications from now until early
September for a $40.5 million wave of grants to replace trucks, replace
engines and retrofit engines with a diesel particulate filter.
Several categories of funding are available, including:
- $50,000 to replace 2003 or older trucks with new trucks that meet 2007 emissions standard;
- $20,000 to replace a 2003 or older engine with a new engine that meets 2007 standards; or
- $5,000 to retrofit a 2006 or older truck with an ARB-verified level 3 diesel particulate filter.
Applications
must come from truck operators who are registered in California, who
drive exclusively in California and have spent at least 50 percent of
their miles traveling on the state’s four trade corridors during the
past two years, including the Central Valley, the Bay Area, the Los
Angeles/Inland Empire or the San Diego/border corridors.
“With
95 million miles traveled each day through the Valley, mainly along
Highway 99 and Interstate 5 corridors, these funds will serve a
much-needed purpose in helping clean up diesel exhaust emissions,” said
Seyed Sadredin, the Air District’s executive director and air pollution
control officer.
For more information on the incentive program and program applications, visit the “grants and Incentives” section at www.valleyair.org or email weberip@valleyair.org, or contact the Emission Reduction Incentive Program at 800-SMOG-INFO (800-766-4463).
Todd DeYoung, the air district’s supervising air quality specialist, told both Land Line and Land Line Now
that the air quality district understands that older trucks run in the
Golden State belong to small businesses and owner operators rather than
large fleets.
“One of our main missions is to target owner
operators and small businesses,” DeYoung said. “We’ve been focusing a
lot of our marketing toward small-business operations.”
DeYoung
said the district did not necessarily target owner-operators. Publicity
for the applications was generated by trade publications and meetings
with truck dealerships who have brought in applicants.
The
Air Quality District recently published a list of about 70 $50,000
truck replacement grants and nearly 400 $5,000 diesel engine retrofit
grants conditionally approved under California’s early diesel emission
reduction program. CARB did not require the early grants to be handed
out through an open application process, and DeYoung said the air
district relied on applications left over from previous grants.
Both
programs rate truck engines by oxides of nitrogen and diesel
particulate combined with miles driven. The air district judges each
individual truck based on its own merit, DeYoung said, no matter how
many trucks a given company applies for.
The district understands that large truck fleets typically replace trucks on a shorter cycle than smaller companies, he said.
“One
of the main tenets of the program was to ensure the single owner
operators had an equal footing, and had an equal opportunity to fund
these programs,” DeYoung told Land Line. “Because it’s looked
at on a truck-by-truck basis, it really evens the playing field. If
they’re keeping their trucks only four and five years, they’re not
going to score as high. Even if they run a lot more miles, they’re
generally not going to score as high as an earlier model, or an old
truck that runs even a minimal amount of miles.
Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
|
Troopers' criminal case over, but questions remain
|
MOUNT LAUREL, N.J. - Seven New Jersey state troopers will
not face criminal charges after a seven-month rape investigation.
But it remains unclear whether _ or when _ they might return to
work.
On Friday, a day after prosecutors in Middlesex County announced
that none of the troopers would be charged with a crime, state
police Capt. Al Della Fave said the troopers will remain suspended
until an internal investigation of their conduct is complete.
Della Fave said it is not clear how long that may take.
In December, a 24-year-old college student reported to
authorities that she had been raped in the Ewing Township home of a
trooper after a night out at a Trenton nightclub.
Seven troopers were suspended with pay while prosecutors
investigated the claims.
The Middlesex County Prosecutor's Office announced Thursday that
there would not be charges against any troopers, but did not
explain why.
Early in the investigation, the lawyer for one of the state
troopers said that there was sexual contact between at least one of
the troopers and the woman _ but that it was consensual.
Nat Dershowitz, a lawyer for the alleged victim, said it was an
unjust decision and that she may file a civil lawsuit or ask the
U.S. Attorney to investigate the investigation.
Dershowitz said that investigators gathered DNA evidence in the
case and that he believes all seven of them could have been charged
with a crime.
Meanwhile, lawyers for the troopers, whose names have not been
made public, say their clients have been exonerated.
But it may not be that simple.
It's possible that Col. Rick Fuentes, the superintendent of the
state police, will charge them with violating department rules. If
so, punishments could range from a reprimand to termination with
loss of pension.
Katherine Hartman, a lawyer for one of the troopers, said that
the fact that a prosecutor dismissed the charges himself rather
than presenting the case to a grand jury to determine if a crime
was committed indicates that the troopers did not violate any laws
_ or even department rules.
"They didn't do anything wrong," Hartman said. "That's why
they shouldn't be charged" internally.
David Jones, president of the State Troopers Fraternal
Organization of New Jersey, said the state police internal
investigation may take some time. After all, he said, the state
police are only now getting the investigation files that were built
by prosecutors over the course of seven months.
"Now you have to start from scratch on the administrative
review," he said. "There's still going to be a lot of review and
consideration."
By GEOFF MULVIHILL |Associated Press Writer
|
|
Federal bill urges bridge inspections, repair
|
A bill scheduled for debate next week in the U.S. House of
Representatives would set in motion a new process for prioritizing the
inspection, inventory and repair of structurally deficient and obsolete
bridges on the National Highway System.
Rep. James Oberstar,
D-MN, chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure
Committee, introduced HR3999 in October 2007 in response to the Aug. 1,
2007, collapse of the Interstate 35 bridge in Minneapolis that killed
13 people including a trucker.
“The I-35 bridge had been
rated as structurally deficient since 1990, and had undergone annual
inspections by the Minnesota Department of Transportation since 1993,”
Oberstar stated in a report to fellow lawmakers.
He said the
bridge received a rating low enough for it to be eligible for
replacement under the Federal Highway Bridge Program, but the bridge
was neither closed nor replaced and the tragedy occurred.
Oberstar’s
bill, also known as the National Highway Bridge Reconstruction and
Inspection Act of 2007, emerged from the House Rules Committee on
Tuesday, July 15, on its way to the House floor. The debate is next
week according to House T&I Committee staff.
The Rules
Committee has allowed a number of amendments to be considered during
debate, including one by Oberstar to create a $5 million pilot program
to install high-tech monitoring equipment on up to 15 bridges in five
states.
Insiders say HR3999 has a lot of bipartisan support on the Hill heading into the debate.
“We
understand that there will be potholes here and there, but it’s
disconcerting to think that a bridge could collapse beneath us,” said
Mike Joyce, senior government affairs representative for the
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association.
“Without that
infrastructure in place, our country suffers. We need to have bridges
and highways that can support our commerce, our goods and services we
provide.”
Federal Highway Administration statistics show
there are more than 73,000 structurally deficient bridges nationwide.
The U.S. Department of Transportation estimates that it would cost $65
billion to upgrade or replace them all.
Oberstar’s
legislation targets bridges on the National Highway System, which has
6,177 structurally deficient bridges and 17,167 functionally obsolete
bridges totaling 23,344 in need of repair, rehabilitation or
replacement.
OOIDA is urging its members to contact their
federal lawmakers to support HR3999. The Capitol switchboard number is
202-224-3121. Give the Capitol operator your ZIP code to be connected
to your representative and senators’ offices.
Click here to read a summary of HR3999 as reported to the House.
|
|
Simulator is bound for Fergus Truck Show July 24-27
|
One of the biggest truck shows in North America is just a week off.
The Fergus, Ontario, truck show in Canada is scheduled for July 24-27
at the Centre Wellington Community Sportsplex.
This year show
management has added an amusement park and an 8-cylinder demolition
derby to the agenda, which already included lots of music, truck and
tractor pulls, a Show & Shine and tons of barbeque.
But wait, there’s more.
The
Owner-Operator’s Business Association of Canada is bringing the thrill
of NASCAR wide-oval racing to the Fergus Truck Show.
The
retired NASCAR Sprint Cup Series race car, sponsored by the
Missouri-based Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, is
currently set up as a simulator/trainer. Equipped with a 24-inch video
screen in the cockpit so drivers can get into the spirit of the race,
the simulator features active full-motion suspension and surround-sound
that provides a realistic racing experience – from the roar of the
engine to the feel of bumps in the track and the impact of hitting
other cars as you wind your way forward from the back of the pack.
“It’s
almost everyone’s dream to drive a NASCAR racer, but this may be as
close as most folks ever get,” stated OBAC Executive Director Joanne
Ritchie in a press release. “We’ll be offering free rides to new OBAC
members who sign up at the show, and collecting donations for Trucking
for Wishes from others. That way, we’ll share in helping children’s
dreams come true as well.”
The Fergus Family Fun Zone,
sponsored by NAL Insurance, will offer amusement rides, family games,
crafts, and play areas at the truck show to raise funds for Trucking
for Wishes. The mission of Trucking for Wishes, working through the
Make-A-Wish Foundation, is to fulfill the dreams of children with life
threatening illnesses.
OBAC and the NASCAR simulator will be set up at space No. L-54 at the Fergus show.
Ritchie
is urging truckers attending the Fergus show to try their luck on the
wide oval. She confirmed that the simulator’s speed-limiter has not
been activated.
OOIDA member Ron Mermis, who travels with the
simulator to truck stops and truck shows all over the U.S. signing up
OOIDA members, is looking forward to bringing the simulator to Canada
for the first time.
“Drivers on both sides of the border need
to work together and speak with a united voice,” says Mermis. “And
there’s nothing wrong with having some fun together, too.” Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
|
FMCSA silent on Arizona enforcement of TV reg on laptops
|
Officials with the FMCSA won’t say whether the agency has told
Arizona to stop citing drivers with laptops in their cabs, more than a
month after the state requested guidance from the federal agency.
The
issue has the potential to affect thousands of truckers who have
computers, GPS devices or other technology in their cabs to track hours
of service and use mapping technology.
In May, OOIDA
received calls from members who had been cited or warned at the San
Simon port of entry weigh station for having a laptop either mounted
near their driver’s seat or sitting in the passenger seat.
However, FMCSA spokesman Duane DeBruyne told Land Line that Section 393.88 wouldn’t cover laptop computers.
Following the inquiries by Land Line Magazine in early June, the Arizona Department of Transportation suspended writing citations for drivers with laptops in their cabs.
Officials
with the state DOT requested an interpretation on Section 393.88 of the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, which bans screens capable of
receiving a television broadcast from being within view of commercial
drivers.
Kristin Schrader, a spokeswoman for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration told Land Line this week the agency has no comment regarding the status of Arizona’s request.
Gerald
Cook, an OOIDA member from Amarillo, TX, was cited in late May and told
by an Arizona DOT officer the ticket could cost him $450. Cook has
pleaded not guilty and is fighting the citation in court.
The story sparked outcry among OOIDA members and Land Line readers, many of whom use laptops for mapping and logbook software, including voice-activated mapping software.
The laptop issue is not likely to go away soon.
Members
of the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance were scheduled to address the
issue of laptop computers in cabs of big trucks at their September
conference in Winnipeg. But the Arizona DOT’s request for a legal
interpretation and other confusion about the rule has magnified the
importance of the issue, CVSA Executive Director Stephen Campbell told Land Line in June.
Arizona DOT spokeswoman Cydney DeModica didn’t return recent phone calls by Land Line.
In previous interviews, DeModica said Arizona DOT enforcement officers
said they had seen drivers typing and using computers for chat sessions. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
|
Avon Mountain truck runaway ramp completed
|
On Avon Mountain in Connecticut, heavy trucks were allowed back on
Route 44 this week now that a state-of-the-art runaway truck ramp has
been completed.
Four people were killed and 19 injured on
July 29, 2005, when a runaway dump truck headed down Route 44 and
crashed into vehicles that were stopped for a red light at the
intersection with Route 10.
The Republican American newspaper
reported the $2.8 million runaway ramp features nets made out of steel
cables and a heating system to keep the ramp’s road surface de-iced.
Heavy trucks were prohibited from using the route for the past month while the ramp was being finished. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
|
Another record-high week for diesel as national average jumps to $4.76
|
For a second straight week, the national average for diesel has set
a new record high – jumping 3.7 cents to average $4.764 a gallon, the
U.S. Energy Information Administration reported Monday, July 14.
After
a slight decline in fuel prices in June, the EIA is reporting a spike
of at least 11.9 cent a gallon for diesel during the first two weeks in
July.
This has truckers paying at least $1.875 a gallon more for diesel during this same time period in 2007.
All nine regions are reporting price increases this past week for diesel.
The
Rocky Mountain region is reporting the highest weekly increase of 4.7
cents a gallon to average $4.723 for diesel. Fuel prices rose 4.5 cents
a gallon in the Midwest to average $4.705, while the Gulf Coast region
is reporting a 4-cent increase to average $4.739 for diesel.
The
regional average for the Lower Atlantic is up 3.7 cents to $4.782,
while fuel prices are up 3.3 cents a gallon to average $4.832 in the
East Coast region.
The average price jumped 2.6 cents a
gallon for diesel in the New England region to average $4.889, while
fuel increased 2.5 cents a gallon in the Central Atlantic region to
average $4.915.
The West Coast region experienced a
2.3-cent per gallon increase to put the average price for a gallon of
fuel at $4.916. Although the California region had the lowest average
increase this past week for diesel – up 2.3 cents – the region still
has the highest average cost for diesel, which is $5.026. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
|
Alaska law now requires most drunken drivers to install Interlock devices
|
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has signed into law a bill that is intended
to get tough with drivers who get behind the wheel after drinking too
much.
The new law, previously HB19, requires first- and
second-time DUI offenders, and some third-time offenders, to install
ignition interlock devices on their vehicles. The rule affecting
misdemeanor offenders takes effect Jan. 1, 2009.
Interlocks
are hooked up to the ignitions of vehicles. Once such a device is
installed, a driver must blow into a mouthpiece, which measures the
amount of alcohol on a person’s breath. If the driver blows clean, the
car will then start; if not, it won’t budge.
In addition,
the devices often require drivers to re-blow in the machine after a
designated period of time, to ensure that they have not convinced
someone else to blow into the mouthpiece for them, or that they haven’t
been drinking since getting behind the wheel.
Advocates for
stricter drunken driving rules cite statistics that show drivers who
are convicted on driving while intoxicated usually have driven drunk 87
times before being caught.
Alaska law now allows judges to
order only people found guilty of driving with a blood-alcohol content
of 0.08 percent or higher to have the interlock devices installed.
Drivers charged with DUI lose their licenses. After 30 days, drivers
may become eligible for limited use licenses that can be used solely to
drive back and forth to work.
The new rule mandates that
first-time DUI offenders who have received misdemeanors keep the device
installed for a minimum of 12 months. Repeat offenders must keep them
hooked up for 24 months while third offenses would mandate the device
be installed for 36 months. They also could drive freely.
To view other legislative activities of interest for Alaska in 2008, click here. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
|
Jim Palmer Trucking to file Chapter 11 bankruptcy
|
A Missoula, MT, trucking company with more than 400 employees
planned to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy Monday, July 14. Jim Palmer
Trucking operates using both company drivers and owner-operators.
The Associated Press quoted
lawyers for Jim Palmer Trucking as saying a poor economy and high fuel
prices have left the company as much as $2 million behind in repaying
loans and other debts. The president of the 44-year-old company says
he’s just looking for a little “breathing room” and fully intends to
continue operating.
Just a month ago, it was reported that
the Canadian billboard company ActionView planned to buy Jim Palmer
Trucking, but the deal fell through at the last minute. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
|
Behind the Wheel - How Long do I...?
|
Discussions with readers over last weeks column raised an interesting
point. I usually talk about it in relation to using a signal light, but
it applies equally well to many other areas such as following distances
or why the speed limit might seem low on what appears to be a straight
road. The topic is driver perception and reaction times and the
question is how long do I need to do something such as signalling
before I change lanes.
As a collision analyst I used three quarters of a second for perception
and the same length of time for reaction if the true time was not
known. What this meant is that a driver who was paying attention could
reasonably be expected to see something, process the situation in their
brain, and make a decision on what to do in that perception time
period. Once decided upon, it took the reaction time period to carry
out that action. In total there was supposed to be a second and a half
between seeing something and beginning to carry out the necessary
action in response to it.
It is possible that someone could be faster, but in the real world it
is far more likely that the combination of these time periods could be
three or four seconds or even more if the driver were distracted by any
of the many things we see or choose to do while driving. So much for
the two second rule if you are a cautious driver!
What does all of this really mean? Let's go back to the example of
signalling a lane change. If you want to be sure other drivers see your
signal, decide what it is that you mean to do and then act by not
getting in the way, you probably need to signal for at least four
seconds. Four seconds before you begin to turn your steering wheel.
Less might mean that the other driver is still discovering or
contemplating your signal and too much more may mean that they have
gone back to trying to decide what exactly it is you mean to do.
Everyone's perception and reaction times are different to some degree
when we compare each other, and we vary individually according to mood,
fatigue, impairment or distraction to name some familiar reasons. Keep
in mind that it is risky to do something too quickly when there is
other traffic near your vehicle or sight distances are short. Never
expect that everyone, including yourself, is always paying attention in
the right place at the right time.
Reference Link
|
|
Wide-ranging effects of high fuel prices
|
As of midday Friday, July 11, oil prices reached record highs of
$147 per barrel. And the ripple effect of record-high fuel prices
continues to spread through the economy.
Record oil prices
have battered the airline industry, and Wednesday, July 9, the airlines
called on Congress to act. In an open letter to all airline customers,
CEOs from 12 of the nation’s airlines said lawmakers must curb
excessive speculation to scale back record fuel costs.
One
small measure taken by US Airways to cut costs is to pull the in-flight
movie entertainment systems off its domestic flights. The airline says
getting rid of the 500 pounds of equipment will save about $10 million
a year in fuel.
Toyota, which can’t keep up with orders for
its gas-electric Prius hybrid, says it will build more at a new plant
in Mississippi that was originally designed to make SUVs.
Agence France-Presse
reported that scooter sales ballooned more than tenfold in the United
States between 1997 and 2007, climbing from 12,000 to 131,000.
According to industry sources, scooter sales have risen 24 percent in
the first quarter of 2008 compared to the same quarter in 2007.
And two top Democratic U.S. Senators appear to be dropping their long-standing opposition to off-shore oil drilling.
“I’m open to drilling and responsible production,” Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin told The Wall Street Journal, adding that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid could also support the move. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
|
Oregon DOT to offer voluntary truck inspections July 18-19
|
The Oregon Department of Transportation’s Motor Carrier
Transportation Division is offering voluntary truck inspections July
18-19 at seven locations around the state.
Inspectors will
check that truck drivers have valid CDLs and medical cards and will
also check the mechanical condition of each truck and trailer, all
subject to the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance inspection criteria.
Vehicles passing the inspection will be issued a CVSA inspection decal
that represents a stamp of approval good for three months.
Each
safety inspection can take up to 30 minutes, so to manage the workload
the motor carrier division is requiring that truckers make
appointments. Inspections will be offered from noon to 8 p.m. Friday,
July 18, and 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturday, July 19, at the following
locations:
- Portland, Jantzen Beach motor carrier division office, 12348 N. Center Ave; (971) 673-5909;
- Woodburn port of entry, I-5 at mile marker 274, southbound inspection; (503) 378-6963;
- Grants Pass, Oregon DOT’s maintenance yard on I-5 at Exit 58, 345 N.E. Agness Ave.; (541) 776-6221, Ext. 1;
- Ashland port of entry on I-5 at mile marker 18 northbound; (541) 776-6221, Ext. 1
- Klamath Falls port of entry, 4647 Highway 97; (541) 883-5701;
- Umatilla port of entry, 1801 S.W. Highway 730; (541) 922-5183; and
- Ontario, DOT maintenance yard, 541 Stanton Blvd., I-84, Exit 371; (541) 869-2010.
“While
our inspectors will not issue citations if they find safety problems
during this event, they can’t let a truck go if they find a critical
safety violation,” MCTD Safety Program Manager David McKane said in a
press release. “You can’t drive your rig back to the shop for repairs.
Any truck found with an out-of-service problem must be fixed before it
can leave the inspection site.”
Reed Black with “Land Line
Now” asked McKane why truckers should volunteer to be inspected. In
other words, what is in it for them?
“If, after the
inspection, there are no defects, what’s in it for the truck driver is
that a defect-free truck will receive an inspection decal that will be
honored at least for the next 90 days indicating that the truck was
inspected,” said McKane. “It’s not a guarantee that it will not be
inspected again, but there’s enough trucks out there today that most
truck inspectors will look for a truck without a decal.”
Visit the Motor Carrier Transportation Division’s Web site here for more information. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
|
Full schedule of fun begins Thursday at the Walcott Truckers Jamboree
|
Beginning at 10 a.m. Thursday, July 10, the 29th annual Walcott
Truckers Jamboree promises something for everyone – from a truck beauty
contest and a pet contest to a pork chop cookout and fireworks.
For a complete schedule of events, click here.
The event runs Thursday and Friday, July 10-11, at the Iowa 80
Truckstop. Take Exit 284 on Interstate 80. Admission and parking are
free, and a shuttle service is available to take you from the parking
area straight to the fun stuff.
The event is scheduled to
include more than 200 exhibits; an antique truck display; trucker
Olympics, carnival games, live bands and fireworks.
A blood drive is set from 11:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. both days and is sponsored by Natso Inc..
During
this year’s event, the Iowa 80 Truckstop will be celebrating the
completion of the new Iowa 80 Trucking Museum Visitor’s Center. A
ribbon-cutting is scheduled for 2 p.m. Thursday and is open to the
public. Refreshments will be served.
“We are very excited
about the museum expansion. The addition of the Visitor’s Center
includes a welcoming entrance, more exhibit space, a movie theater and
restrooms,” said Delia Moon Meier, senior vice president.
The
Walcott Truckers Jamboree began in 1979, featuring a few exhibits, live
music, food and a small display of antique trucks. That first Jamboree
attracted only a few hundred drivers, a far cry from the 30,000 it
attracts today.
“The Walcott Truckers Jamboree is our way of
saying ‘thank you’ to drivers for the work they do to deliver the goods
we need. It is also a great opportunity for those interested in trucks
and trucking to get a close-up look at some of the most fantastic
trucks,” Meier said in a press release. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
| |
|
Western Express Shirks Responsibility
|
Western Express Shirks Responsibility
Saturday, June 7, 2008 at 5:20 pm, a team of white glove drivers were in the sleeper legally parked on the front row at the Flying J in Franklin KY waiting to load on Monday June 9. They were in the sleeper watching TV when the truck was violently hit from the rear, not once but twice! The impacts were so severe that they were thrown forward out of their seats at the dinabunk and their coffee pot was thrown over. The truck was shoved five feet forward, sliding the truck with the emergency brake set.
The team quickly exited the truck to find that Western Express truck #5658 driver pulling a flatbed trailer had hit them with the corner of his trailer, backed up and hit them again while trying to get into the spot next to them. The team dialed 911 and a county sheriff arrived only to tell them that he could not write a report on private property according to state law.
He did provide the team with a Civilian Collision Report form, which they had the Western Express driver fill out and sign. That report included driver's personal information and truck identifying information along with Western Express's insurance carrier information.
The team identified that the damage to the truck box was extensive.
Report from team drivers: Visual Damage to Truck
- Left dock bumper and bumper guard twisted driver side rear:
- Light above it (stop and turn)
- Light above that (Back up light)
-Drain tube & rubber under floor bent and rubber torn
-Bottom corner twisted and corner box support with grab handle & Lights twisted and bent half to three quarters of the way up toward top of box
-Rear Driver side panel bent outward and creased up to top of box
-silver box rail under panel is bent outward
-hinges on back door bent and door damaged.
-Door seal and door will not open
-right side marker lights on box not working.
-Possible lift gate problems due to the location of the damage.
Due to the damage to the truck box, the team had to cancel the load they were dispatched on to pick up. The load was to be temperature controlled and the damage would not allow accurate temperature control to protect the load. The load would have paid $2483.90. This revenue was lost. The team had already deadheaded 228 miles to be in position to pick up the load. They deadheaded an additional 399 miles to the box repair shop in Goshen IN after the accident. This put them behind on cost of fuel. Supreme Repair was the only bright light in this fiasco, working overtime and on the weekend to complete the repairs quickly.
The owner contacted Western Express where he was talked to as if he had been the one to hit the truck! The person he spoke with was rude and unhelpful telling him that Western Express paid out of pocket for accident repair up to a certain amount. They also told him it would be 30 days at the soonest before they would pay for the repairs and to send them copies of the repair bills. Supreme Repair sent Western Express three separate faxes of the repair bills as did the owner of the truck, but each time the faxes were sent, Western Express denied receiving them. Finally, after his third attempt of faxing the repair bills, the owner sent the repair bill by certified letter, return receipt requested.
The owner's fleet is small, three trucks, he does not have the equipment to send another truck in for the team to drive and with the specialized hauling they do, could not just go out and rent another truck for a month or more until Western Express might pay the repair bill and get the truck out of the shop. Therefore, the owner had to pay for the repairs out of his own pocket to get the truck out of the shop and the team back to work. Luckily, he was in a position to do so, in this economy of slow freight and high fuel costs, many owner operators/small fleet owners would not be.
In subsequent calls to Western Express, the owner has been continually treated rudely and lied to by employees and a supervisor who said he would look into it and get back to the owner, but the supervisor has not done so to this day. They did say that they would not pay him for lost revenue even though the lost revenue was due to their driver's carelessness.
This is a simply fixed matter; accept responsibility for your driver's actions, pay for the repairs and the reasonable downtime losses submitted and everyone goes their own way. Instead, one gets rudeness and lies from the lower and middle echelons of management. This is not right! The team and the owner of the truck are the injured parties and should not lose their hard-earned money due to carelessness and poor judgment of a company and its employee! Nor should they be treated like they are the guilty ones in this incident, the team was legally parked at a truck stop when hit by a Western Express driver.
Again, the owner of the truck was lucky and able to pay for the repairs out of pocket and get the truck and its team back out on the road being productive instead of letting it sit in the repair shop for weeks waiting for Western Express to step up to the plate and deal with its responsibilities. If the owner would not have been able to do this, he would have lost the truck and the team would have been out of work. Is this the way that Western Express conducts all of its business? Is it Western Express's goal to put owner operators and small fleet owners out of business?
If this is the way that Western Express handles its obligations with the bad attitude and lack of attention to detail by its supervisors, one wonders if the president of the company, Wayne Wise, is aware of what is going on in his own company or is this his way of doing business? One can only hope not! We will watch this very closely, and if it is not resolved satisfactorily in the extremely near future, we will dig deeper into the history of Western Express and how it handles its liability for their driver's actions.
From Global Trucking Media: Sally Sue Miller
|
|
Senate considers bill to limit energy futures speculation
|
To address high fuel prices at the pump, the U.S. Senate is
considering a law that goes directly to the source – oil commodities
trading and speculators blamed for rapid increases in oil prices.
Trading
of oil futures by speculators has been blamed for increasing the cost
of gas by as much as 50 percent. Elected officials have introduced a
flurry of bills aimed at closing the “Enron loophole,” which allowed
overseas trading of U.S. oil and preceded huge increases in oil
speculation over the last five years.
Senators planned to discuss the Stop Excessive Energy Speculation Act –S3268 – Thursday, July 17, Congressional Quarterly
reported. The bill would add 100 full-time employees to the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission, the agency charged with regulating futures
trading, and would limit speculation trading “by those who are not
trading actual physical petroleum products.”
The bill also
would force U.S.-based oil traders to comply with U.S. trading
regulations even when operating through foreign exchanges.
“Right
now, Wall Street traders are raising gas prices with nothing more than
the click of a mouse,” said Sen. Harry Reid, D-NV, said in a written
statement. “Without regard of anything but their own profits, traders
are bidding up prices by buying huge quantities of oil just to sell
them at an even higher price.”
“This bill will address the
rising cost of gasoline in the short-term, prevent Wall Street traders
from gaming the oil markets, and ensure that American consumers are
paying a fair price at the pump,” Reid said. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
|
Oregon DOT to offer voluntary truck inspections July 18-19
|
The Oregon Department of Transportation’s Motor Carrier
Transportation Division is offering voluntary truck inspections Friday
and Saturday, July 18 and 19, at seven locations around the state.
Inspectors
will check that truck drivers have valid CDLs and medical cards and
will also check the mechanical condition of each truck and trailer, all
subject to the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance inspection criteria.
Vehicles passing the inspection will be issued a CVSA inspection decal
that represents a stamp of approval good for three months.
Each
safety inspection can take up to 30 minutes, so to manage the workload
the motor carrier division is requiring that truckers make
appointments. Inspections will be offered from noon to 8 p.m. Friday
and 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturday at the following locations:
- Portland, Jantzen Beach motor carrier division office, 12348 N. Center Ave; (971) 673-5909;
- Woodburn port of entry, I-5 at mile marker 274, southbound inspection; (503) 378-6963;
- Grants Pass, Oregon DOT’s maintenance yard on I-5 at Exit 58, 345 N.E. Agness Ave.; (541) 776-6221, Ext. 1;
- Ashland port of entry on I-5 at mile marker 18 northbound; (541) 776-6221, Ext. 1
- Klamath Falls port of entry, 4647 Highway 97; (541) 883-5701;
- Umatilla port of entry, 1801 S.W. Highway 730; (541) 922-5183; and
- Ontario, DOT maintenance yard, 541 Stanton Blvd., I-84, Exit 371; (541) 869-2010.
“While
our inspectors will not issue citations if they find safety problems
during this event, they can’t let a truck go if they find a critical
safety violation,” MCTD Safety Program Manager David McKane said in a
press release. “You can’t drive your rig back to the shop for repairs.
Any truck found with an out-of-service problem must be fixed before it
can leave the inspection site.”
Reed Black with “Land Line
Now” asked McKane why truckers should volunteer to be inspected. In
other words, what is in it for them?
“If, after the
inspection, there are no defects, what’s in it for the truck driver is
that a defect-free truck will receive an inspection decal that will be
honored at least for the next 90 days indicating that the truck was
inspected,” said McKane. “It’s not a guarantee that it will not be
inspected again, but there’s enough trucks out there today that most
truck inspectors will look for a truck without a decal.”
Visit the Motor Carrier Transportation Division’s Web site here for more information. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
|
Kentucky sends one letter, suspends CDL privileges for many
|
Maria Arnold was stunned to hear the news from a potential employer.
The
state of Kentucky had suspended her commercial driver’s license so the
carrier couldn’t hire her, the manager of a trucking company told
Arnold – an OOIDA member from Springfield, KY.
Arnold later
learned the state had sent a letter in May to her home address – not
her post office box – while she was out on the road.
“Apparently they only sent it to my physical address and when they did, of course, it was returned,” Arnold told Land Line. “After 30 days, they cancelled my CDL. I was outraged.”
The
Kentucky Transportation Cabinet recently suspended an unpublicized
number of CDLs just 30 days after mailing a request for information to
CDL holders.
The Transportation Cabinet’s office of public affairs responded to some of Land Line’s
questions by e-mail, but did not say how many CDLs were suspended or
whether the action had led to officials seizing any trucks or loads.
Agency
spokesman David Devers said the Kentucky General Assembly required that
certain 10-year driving record information be added to CDL applications
by 2005. CDL holders were recently notified if they hadn’t submitted
the applications, Devers said. Those drivers’ CDL privileges were then
canceled “until we do receive it” Devers said.
“Anyone who
has a question about this matter can call our CDL section at the
Kentucky Transportation Cabinet at (502) 564-0280,” Devers said.
Arnold
said her CDL was quickly reinstated – without a fee – after she called
and faxed information to the state. Arnold said she was told 5,000 to
8,000 Kentucky CDL holders may be driving under suspended licenses.
The
Washington County, KY, area has a few sizable trucking companies and
many truck drivers, Washington County Circuit Clerk George Graves told Land Line. Graves said the suspension has led to “a few” harried phone calls from truck drivers needing to become street legal again.
Arnold feels their pain.
“I hate to think of all these owner operators out there who don’t know they’re driving without a CDL,” Arnold told Land Line. “Most of them are not coming home all the time, as hard as things are now.”
– By Charlie Morasch, staff writer
|
|
Overweight trucks fined as much as $10,000 at NYC bridges, tunnels
|
Truckers hauling overweight loads are risking heavy fines if they try to cross New York City’s bridges and tunnels.
Officials
with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Bridges and Tunnels
division said truck drivers carrying more than 80,000 pounds can be
fined as much as $10,000 each for crossing MTA facilities.
MTA
Bridges and Tunnels facilities are the Bronx-Whitestone, Cross Bay
Veterans Memorial, Henry Hudson, Marine Parkway-Gil Hodges Memorial,
Throgs Neck, Triborough and Verrazano-Narrows bridges, and the
Brooklyn-Battery and Queens Midtown tunnels.
The Bridges
and Tunnels Division officials said they have recently issued more than
100 summonses per month to overweight trucks, some as heavy as 200,000
pounds. The truckers were fined and told to turn around. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
|
New Louisiana laws require drivers to move over, boosts certain fines
|
Gov. Bobby Jindal has signed into law two bills that are intended to
make Louisiana roadways safer when emergency personnel or highway
workers are present.
One new law, previously SB657, would
mandate a practice followed by professional truckers for decades. The
rule is designed to protect police and other emergency personnel during
roadside stops.
All drivers now are required, when
practical, to merge into a lane further away from stationary emergency
vehicles that are by the road with their lights flashing. If unable to
change lanes or driving on two-lane highways, travelers are required to
slow to a “safe speed.” Violators would face fines up to $200.
Louisiana
law previously called for drivers to slow to a speed of 25 mph or the
posted speed, whichever is lower, upon approach.
Also
included in the new law is a provision that is intended to keep
roadsides clear. It authorizes the towing of vehicles within 24 hours.
Previously,
towing could only be done 48 hours after a notice was posted on the
windshield. In addition, municipalities and parishes could only tow
vehicles 10 days after registered or certified letters were sent. The
new law also removes that restriction.
Another provision in
the new law requires the Louisiana Department of Transportation and
Development and the State Police to partner with the Louisiana Motor
Transport Association and others to run an “instant tow” pilot program
for the removal of commercial and personal vehicles.
The pilot programs will be set up in two areas of the state with “high density” interstate traffic.
It
is intended to reduce congestion and provide for more effective
response times, as well as “efficiently preserving commercial goods.”
The
second bill signed into law – HB1151 – doubles fines for motorists
caught driving in excess of the speed limit while in construction zones
where highway workers are present. It takes effect Aug. 15.
To view other legislative activities of interest for Louisiana in 2008, click here. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
|
OOIDA, Volvo, recognize drivers for safe driving records
|
OOIDA recently announced honorees in the Association’s Safe Driving
Award program. The following drivers have been recognized by the
Association and program sponsor Volvo Trucks North America for truck
driving excellence.
Rodney Abrams of Dayton, OH, has been
recognized for 11 years of safe, accident-free driving. Rodney
currently hauls automotive parts for Honda.
Betty Beaudoin of Dieterich, IL, has been recognized for nine years of safe, accident-free truck driving.
David
Billinger of Osawatomie, KS, has been recognized for five years of
safe, accident-free driving of a commercial tractor-trailer. David
currently hauls storage containers, heavy machinery, farm equipment and
other general freight.
David N. Borchers of Blackburn, MO,
has been recognized by OOIDA for 30 years of safe, accident-free truck
driving. David currently hauls feed.
Howard Brouwer of
Welland, Ontario, Canada, has been recognized by OOIDA for 10 years of
safe, accident-free driving. Howard hauls general dry freight.
G.
Patrick Carty of Port Hueneme, CA, has been recognized by OOIDA for
three years of safe, accident-free truck driving. Patrick hauls general
freight. He is also on active duty with the U.S. Navy.
Richard
Gehman of Blakeslee, PA, has been recognized for 17 years of safe,
accident-free trucking. Richard currently hauls corrugated cardboard.
Jose
R. Hernandez of Deltona, FL, has been recognized for 10 years of safe,
accident-free driving of a commercial tractor-trailer. Jose hauls
general freight.
Frank B. Kopp of Graham, WA, has been recognized for 32 years of safe, accident-free truck driving. Frank hauls produce.
Roger Larkins of Chubbuck, ID, has been recognized for 15 years of safe, accident-free truck driving.
Dennis
McGuire of Clarksville, IN, has been recognized for three years of
safe, accident-free driving of a commercial tractor-trailer. Dennis
currently hauls steel coils.
Wendell Penny of Dieterich, IL, has been recognized for nine years of safe, accident-free truck driving.
George
W. Pierce, Jr. of Wills Point, TX, has been recognized for 16 years of
safe, accident-free driving of a commercial tractor-trailer. George
hauls freight of all kinds.
Doug Thee of St. Joseph, MO,
has been recognized for 16 years of safe, accident-free truck driving.
Doug currently hauls refrigerated containers of pork to Oakland ports
and then brings produce back to the Midwest.
The OOIDA Safe
Driving Award Program is designed to recognize and reward OOIDA members
for their safe, accident-free years while operating a commercial
vehicle. Safe driving awards are available to all eligible OOIDA
members who qualify based upon the number of years for which the member
has operated a commercial vehicle without being involved in a
preventable accident.
The program is sponsored by Volvo Trucks North America.
|
|
Missouri approves truck lane restrictions, other provisions of note
|
Missouri Gov. Matt Blunt has signed into law a lengthy bill that includes several provisions of interest to truck drivers.
The
new law, previously SB930, prohibits large trucks from traveling in the
far left lane on certain roads through Kansas City and St. Louis.
Trucks
with a registered gross weight in excess of 48,000 pounds will be
prohibited from driving in the far left lane of “urbanized” highways
that have at least three lanes of traffic in each direction. The rule
change will take effect once signage is posted.
State law
enacted a year ago already prohibits trucks heavier than 24,000 pounds
from driving in the left-most lane of Interstate 70 within three miles
of the intersection with state Route 370 in St. Charles County.
Advocates
for keeping trucks out of the far left lane say it makes roadways safer
for all travelers. A Missouri-based truckers group says that sentiment
couldn’t be further from the truth. An official with the Owner-Operator
Independent Drivers Association says the group opposes lane
restrictions for any class of vehicle.
“Adopting lane
restrictions is an ill-advised step to take,” said OOIDA Executive Vice
President Todd Spencer. “Such restrictions invariably cause more
problems than they fix.
“When you start restricting
vehicles to certain lanes you end up with more vehicles tailgating, and
making unsafe passing maneuvers in all lanes. This isn’t good for
congestion or highway safety.
“Lane restrictions simply discourage smart, safe driving practices.”
Spencer said it’s regrettable that lawmakers saw fit to make the change.
“This is an example where politics trumped safety and common sense,” he said.
In addition, Spencer pointed out that Missouri law already has restrictions to keep all traffic to the right except to pass.
Other
provisions of note attached to the bill include an incentive to reduce
idling, allow local enforcement of truck rules and prohibit certain
indemnification agreements.
The maximum gross vehicle
weight limit and axle weight limit for large trucks equipped with idle
reduction technology will be increased. Affected trucks are authorized
to weigh up to an additional 400 pounds.
The procedure for
conducting roadside inspections for large trucks also will be revised.
A program will be set up to certify local law enforcement officers to
enforce commercial motor vehicle laws.
Certified law
enforcement officers could conduct random roadside examinations or
inspections to determine compliance with the CMV weight and size limit
laws. Officers who are not certified still could pull over large trucks
with a “visible external safety defect.”
Indemnity
agreements also are prohibited in motor carrier transportation
contracts that claim “to indemnify a party against loss from negligence
or intentional acts void and unenforceable.”
A separate
provision in the bill is intended to keep repeat drunken drivers from
driving drunk. In order to get back behind the wheel, ignition
interlock devices soon will be required to be installed on repeat
offenders’ vehicles.
Interlocks are hooked up to the
ignition of vehicles. Once such a device is installed, a driver must
blow into a mouthpiece, which measures the amount of alcohol on a
person’s breath. If the driver blows clean, the car will then start; if
not, it won’t budge.
In addition, the devices often require
drivers to re-blow in the machine after a designated period of time, to
ensure that they have not convinced someone else to blow into the
mouthpiece for them or that they haven’t been drinking since getting
behind the wheel.
To view other legislative activities of interest for Missouri in 2008, click here. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
|
Ganja art? Trucker-posing feds find ton of marijuana inside pottery
|
Eight defendants have pleaded guilty to importing more than 2,200 pounds of marijuana from Mexico using pottery.
The
guilty pleas followed an investigation in which federal agents posed as
a trucking company to pick up and deliver the drugs.
Jose
Sandoval, 19, Roberto Mota, 27, Roberto Hildalgo, 21, and Antonio
Herrera-Espinoza, 30, pleaded guilty in federal court to distributing
and possessing with intent to distribute more than 1,000 kilograms of
marijuana. Juan Carlos Torres, 19, Gavin James Herremans, 25, and
Christopher James Johnson, 29, pleaded guilty to reduced charges,
according to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement news release.
According
to ICE, U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers in Baltimore
discovered the drugs among 193 Mexican pottery vases in January.
Later,
two Baltimore ICE agents posed as employees of a commercial trucking
company, and delivered the shipment to a warehouse in Edwardsburg, MI.
ICE
agents met at the warehouse with Herremans, Roberto Mota, Hildalgo,
Herrera-Espinoza, Torres, Sandoval and a juvenile. Herremans signed for
the load as others unloaded the vases into two U-Haul trucks.
Agents arrested the defendants as they tried to leave the warehouse.
Humberto Mota – who ran an unnamed business out of Elkhart, IN – remains at large, according to the release.
“ICE
will continue to pursue organizations that smuggle and distribute
commercial quantities of illicit drugs,” said Brian Moskowitz, special
agent in charge of the ICE Office of Investigations in Detroit. “ICE
uses our broad and unique law enforcement authorities and expertise to
dismantle these criminal groups to help ensure the integrity of our
nation’s borders, and to help keep illegal drugs off our streets.” Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
|
SPECIAL REPORT: Study shows pros and cons of speed limiters
|
Transport Canada has completed its highly anticipated study on speed
limiters. In simple terms, the study acknowledges some of the safety
and environmental benefits promoted by large motor carrier
associations, but it also acknowledges many of the problems that
owner-operator groups have brought to the discussion.
Canada’s
federal transportation ministry released the study on Friday, July 4.
It was commissioned by a steering committee of provincial
transportation officials, and is divided up into an overall summary and
six categories: Safety; technical considerations; trade and
competitiveness; the environment; a speed-limiter case study; and the
use of speed limiters around the globe.
Both sides of the speed limiter debate are likely to use the study to bolster their respective arguments.
“What
we see in this study is more of what we’ve been telling the Ontario
government, that studies just don’t support this. If you conduct your
independent research, it will show that when you create speed
differentials on highways, your rates of accidents or interactions
between objects moving at different speeds is going to increase,” Laura
O’Neill, government affairs counsel for the Owner-Operator Independent
Drivers Association, told “Land Line Now” on XM Satellite Radio.
Click here to view and navigate the study menu.
Transport
Canada, which is comparable to the U.S. Department of Transportation,
published the findings less than three weeks after the Ontario
Legislature approved legislation to require that electronic speed
limiters be set on all heavy trucks doing business in the province.
Provincial officials continue to promote a maximum setting of 105 km/h
or 65 mph.
Ontario officials are pushing for implementation
this fall, beginning with six to 12 months of educational time. Full
enforcement would begin in 2009, officials told Land Line.
Quebec
has a similar provision to require speed limiters, but officials in
that province said they would wait on other Canadian provinces to
“harmonize” on the issue.
While officials in New Brunswick
are pondering the introduction of a similar law, officials in Alberta
and Saskatchewan have come out against mandatory speed limiters.
O’Neill
said the Transport Canada study raises important points about speed
limiters even if many of the points have been stated repeatedly by
people and groups on both sides of the issue.
Safety issues
Researchers who conducted the portion of the Transport Canada study on
safety said speed limiters would make highways safer, particularly when
the roads are not congested. Add congestion to the mix, and the numbers
change.
“As
the volume is set close to capacity (2000 vehicles per hour per lane)
more vehicle interactions take place and this leads to a reduction in
safety especially for those segments with increased merging and
lane-change activity, such as on and off ramp segments,” researchers
stated.
“In these instances the introduction of truck speed
limiters can actually reduce the level of safety when compared to the
non-limiter case.”
The researchers said passing on rural highways could also be a safety issue when it involves speed-limited trucks.
Trade and competitiveness
Government-mandated speed limiters in Ontario could keep American
owner-operators out and could hinder the right of Canadian truckers to
do business in and out of the province, researchers said in the trade
section of the study.
“The
majority (80 percent) of the owner-operators interviewed indicated that
to avoid being speed limited they would no longer haul into Quebec or
Ontario,” researchers said. “This may limit competition to the extent
that these operators do avoid operating in these jurisdictions.”
The
situation could be remedied, researchers said, if truckers purchased
equipment that allowed them to change their speed-limiter settings upon
entering or exiting a particular jurisdiction.
O’Neill says the investment in such technology could be cost-prohibitive to many owner-operators.
Technical considerations
Truck Manufacturers Association President Bob Clarke contributed to the
study by answering technical questions from researchers that included
cost of equipment to set and check speed limiters from the cab. Such
devices vary by manufacturer, Clarke said.
“A
driver/owner equipped with a diagnostic tool could connect to the
diagnostic port in the cab and adjust the ‘maximum road speed’
parameter setting if it is not password protected,” Clarke stated. “The
software to do this would cost about $450, while the connectors and
other hardware needed would cost about $650-$700. The ability to make
these changes remotely, via GPS, does not exist at this time.”
Clarke
also weighed in on the fuel economy discussion to say that driver
habits and spec’ing of individual trucks play a major role.
“If
a truck’s power train (engine, transmission rear axles and tires) is
specified to maximize fuel economy and is prevented from operating in
that range due to speed limiting, there is likely to be a reduction in
fuel economy,” he said.
“Fuel economy is greatly
dependant on how a vehicle is operated, so it is conceivable that any
reduction or improvement of fuel economy resulting from a reduced
maximum speed limit may be negated depending on how a driver’s behavior
is modified.”
Click here to read the technical questions and answers.
Environmental benefits
Transport Canada researchers said speed limiters on trucks would bring
about a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and fuel consumption on
those particular trucks.
What
OOIDA officials and others contend is that, while the slowed truck may
save fuel, the vehicles interacting with the slower truck may burn more
fuel because of the decelerating, passing and accelerating that would
occur.
“I just have to point out that it doesn’t look like
the savings are all that great,” O’Neill said, referring to Transport
Canada’s estimate of 1.4 percent fuel savings for trucks on Canadian
highways.
Researchers said in the report that speed-limited
trucks would save 228 million liters of fuel per year, or approximately
60.4 million gallons. They also concluded that greenhouse gas emissions
would be reduced by 0.64 metric megatons or approximately 705,472 tons.
Speed limiter case study
Transport Canada conducted a case study that showed speed limiters are
a way of life for many large fleets. From the standpoint of the large
fleets surveyed, speed limiters have significant benefits for industry,
for government and the general public.
The
case study also included input from the Owner-Operators Business
Association of Canada, which is categorically opposed to a
speed-limiter mandate, and the Private Motor Truck Council of Canada.
PMTC officials have also expressed opposition to a mandate, but they
took a wait-and-see approach to the Transport Canada research.
Speed limiters around the world
Researchers for Transport Canada acknowledge that 33 countries have
government-mandated speed limiters including the United Kingdom, Sweden
and Australia. The steering committee for the study directed
researchers to relate those speed-limiter experiences to Canada.
Researchers reported a lack of follow-up studies in countries with speed limiters.
“Ten
years later, no empirical studies have been done in any participating
jurisdictions to directly link the use of speed limiters with
improvements in road safety,” the researchers wrote.
“Additionally,
there is a lack of research on the safety impacts of truck-car speed
differentials due to speed-limited trucks. It is, therefore, difficult
to predict the potential road safety impacts of a speed limiter mandate
in Canada.”
The United Kingdom has reported fuel savings in
speed-limited vehicles as well as reduced insurance premiums, but
road-safety concerns also surfaced – including passing, traffic backlog
and convoys of trucks blocking the on and off-ramps on highways. There
were also issues with compliance and enforcement, including tampering
and problems with testing equipment.
In summary, the study shows benefits of speed limiters but also highlights problems with government mandates.
OOIDA
officials plan to challenge Bill 41 in Ontario – which included the
speed limiter mandate – on grounds that it violates trade laws and
discriminates against truck drivers in Canada and the U.S.
|
|
Rhode Island lowers truck weight limit on two bridges
|
A new law in Rhode Island restricts large trucks from two bridges in
the state. The change coincides with the reposting of weight limits on
the bridges.
Gov. Donald Carcieri signed a bill into law that
prohibits vehicles with more than two axles or any combination vehicle
equipped with more than two axles per unit from crossing the state
Route 24 bridge over the Pawtucket River and the Interstate 95 bridge
over the Sakonnet River.
The new law, previously HB8219, took effect this past month. It will remain in effect until June 12, 2011.
Signs will be posted to alert truckers about the restrictions.
Violators would face $3,000 fines. Subsequent offenses would result in up to $5,000 fines.
Supporters
say the change is a practical, efficient and effective way of ensuring
that overweight trucks don’t cross the bridges. They say the two-axle
limit is easier for the State Police to enforce than requiring them to
pull over trucks to check weights.
Opponents cited concerns
about rising fuel costs that make detours around the bridges more
costly. Local operations that must take the long detour are especially
vulnerable, they say.
In addition to the axle limits on the
two spans, trucks also are limited to 18 tons – down from 22 tons. Many
heavier loads must route around.
Concerns about the corrosion of steel beams on the bridges led to the change.
The
Rhode Island Department of Transportation is attempting to protect the
bridges by slowing their deterioration. Ultimately, the agency is
expected to replace both bridges.
To view other legislative activities of interest for Rhode Island in 2008, click here. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
|
Navistar increases truck prices
|
Commodity prices that have as much as doubled in the past six months
have led Navistar International Corp. to increase prices on
International trucks, effective immediately.
Price increases will vary by model, topping out at $1,600 per truck, according to a Navistar press release.
Prices
have soared for commodities essential to truck manufacturing, such as
crude oil, steel, aluminum, copper, and precious metals used in new
emissions-compliant diesel engines. According to the release, since the
beginning of 2008, steel has increased 100 percent, aluminum by 22
percent, platinum by 32 percent and copper by 23 percent. Crude oil
prices have jumped by more than 40 percent.
“We are acutely
aware of the financial constraints that many truck customers are
currently facing and have been working diligently to absorb as much of
these costs as possible,” said James L. Hebe, senior vice president,
North American Dealer Operations, Navistar. “However, global commodity
spikes are affecting all manufacturing and we finally, regretfully,
must now share those additional costs with the customer.”
Navistar
is aggressively working to mitigate the higher commodity prices, as
well as offset the negative impact of a weakened U.S. dollar, by
attacking operational costs wherever possible and by negotiating
greater efficiencies with suppliers. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
|
Useful Links Helpful Industry related Links
Government Links:
Misc. Resources
|
|
|  |
|
There isn't a Biggest Story for Today, yet.
|
|