Trucker in standoff at Gateway Commerce Center after crashing into facilityEDWARDSVILLE • A man who claims to be armed is in a standoff this morning with authorities at a trucking facility at Gateway Commerce Center after he crashed a flatbed truck into the structure. A fire resulting from the crash drew firefighters from several departments to the Schneider National trucking facility, but the fire burned itself out. Authorities said the trucker tried to set fire to all of the computers inside the facility, but sprinklers extinguished those blazes. Shortly after 2 a.m., emergency dispatchers got a call from a worker at Schneider National, reporting the incident. Shortly thereafter, dispatchers received a call from the trucker, who said he was armed and would not be taken alive, authorities said. Gateway Commerce Center is a sprawling warehouse and light-industrial area in west Edwardsville, north of Interstate 270 and west of Interstate 255. Schneider National is a nationwide trucking company based in Green Bay, Wisc. Trucking braces for impact of new food safety lawAll the practical implications of the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2011 (now Public Law 111-353) are not yet spelled out when it comes to the trucking industry. What is clear, however, is that the new law, if it withstands post-enactment efforts by opponents still seeking revisions and/or financing cuts, will further tighten federal control over the transportation of food - from equipment and procedures to traceability and accountability. Section 111 of the new law, for instance, requires the Health and Human Services secretary to “promulgate regulations onsanitary transportation practices for the transportationof food,” and also requires theFDA (Food and Drug Administration) “to conduct a study on the transportation of food, including the unique needs of rural and frontier areas.” Section 204 requires the Health and Human Services secretary to “improve tracking and tracing of processed foods and fruits and vegetables that are raw agricultural commodities in the event of a food-borne illness outbreak; and establish standards for the type of information, format, and time frame for persons to submit records to aid the secretary in such tracking and tracing.” The Food Safety Modernization Act is, by no means, the first and only move to help assure that food remains safe to eat from farm to the fork. Shippers of some cargo, like perishable food and pharmaceuticals, have been asking fleets to step up and assume additional responsibility for the integrity and safety of their cargo for some time. They are and have been requiring carriers to deploy technology to help assure the integrity and safety of their goods and, in the case of temperature-controlled food for instance, also help to reduce spoilage and loss. The shippers’ customers’ in this case are the ones holding the whip handle, according to Dr. John Ryan, president of Ryan Systems. Ryan has spent over 25 years implementing high-technology quality control systems and is credited with piloting the first farm-to-fork, Internet-enabled food traceability system using sensors and RFID technology to help get the job done. “Mostly, the suppliers’ customers are the ones who want to know the data about the perishables they are paying for,” he says. “They are driving this because they are the ones on the front line facing the customer, the end user. Their message is plain: You are responsible for what you are shipping to me.” The good news, according to Ryan, is that technologies are available that are equal to the task. “Technology is actually pretty good,” he says. “You can use sensors to get temperature readings at the pallet level and you can use GPS to track the load and cellular technology to transmit the temperature data in real time. We can also use sensors to detect tampering or find explosives. There is a lot of new sensor technology coming on line now,” Ryan adds, “which will provide real-time visibility to a number of other variables. It is not just food safety and liability issues that are driving the need for better cargo-specific information, he notes. Food spoilage in transit is also “a huge issue.” Approximately 5 to 7% of food is lost in transit. In this case, using technology to monitor temperature and to optimize cargo loading and routing can be a big help. “Produce with the shortest shelf life should be delivered first and through the shortest route,” Ryan notes, “in order to give that retailer the most shelf life possible. Technology makes that doable.” Ryan lists three primary technologies on his solutions list: “RFID (Identification, Location and Condition ), Global Positioning Systems (GPS), Geographic Messaging Service (GMS) and new sensing technologies, that can add real-time status reports in terms of “on-time delivery of goods, global positioning, in-transit temperatures, humidity, shock, acceleration, tampering, explosive detection, contamination detection, pre-notification for port authorities, while providing e-mail or cell phone alerts for out-of-control conditions.” In his article called, “Quantum Traceability,” Ryan notes that, “These technological changes represent a major breakthrough for the food safety and food quality arenas in terms of reducing (or appropriately assigning) recall liabilities, providing longer shelf life and higher quality to buyers, while meeting governmental transportation control requirements.” These tougher standards will apply to food from home or from far away—food transported along local and relatively short supply chains or along global chains that wrap around the world. As a general rule, most citizens don’t presently worry much about the safety of eating every pickle and chip, each salad and crust. At home or away, Americans graze unfazed on food from around the globe. There is asparagus from Peru, coffee from Africa and farm-raised shrimp from Bangladesh. Ginger makes its way from China to meet up with onions and peppers from Mexico in a tasty stir fry with lamb from New Zealand. Although dinner may have traveled farther than the diner will in a lifetime, it goes unremarked. One reason diners don’t usually have to be concerned is because so many others have been doing the fussing for them, watching over temperatures and worrying about contamination (accidental or intentional). Motor carriers involved in the transport of food, however, may find still more responsibilities on their plates in the future. It is definitely something to chew on. Tractor-trailer hauling pigs wrecks on I-77Chris Dorst
Starting Monday, medical certification reg kicks inStarting Monday, Jan. 30, truckers headed off to the state driver’s licensing agency need to have one more piece of paper to stay legal with their CDL: proof of medical certification. A new regulation that goes into effect on Jan. 30 mandates that all interstate CDL holders and applicants provide proof of their medical certification to their home state licensing agency. The regulation will eventually require by Jan. 30, 2014, that agencies input the proof of certification into the commercial driver’s license information system – dubbed CDLIS by the feds – to give roadside law enforcement access to the certification and CDL electronically. However, many states were not prepared for the CDLIS reporting requirement so the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration delayed the state’s data entry deadline to 2014. In the meantime, anyone who has a licensing “action,” such as renewal, upgrade, transfer, etc., after Jan. 30 will have to provide proof of medical certification. It’s up to the states to decide if the medical examiners “long form” or the actual medical certificate will be required. Either way, that proof must be presented when conducting CDL-related business at the state licensing agency. In addition to providing their medical certification, drivers will be asked to self-certify whether they are interstate or intrastate drivers and whether they work in an exempt segment of the industry – like school bus drivers or fire department personnel. Each state will enact different timelines and methods for CDL holders to provide medical certification proof and to self certify those who do not have a licensing action coming up for the next couple of years because all CDL holders must report by Jan. 30, 2014. CDL holders whose license does not expire until after the 2014 deadline need to be mindful that they will be required to self-certify and provide proof of medical certification before Jan. 30, 2014, regardless. Failing to follow through with these requirements could result in a downgrade of your license and possible suspension. Click here for a state-by-state breakdown on how medical certification proof will be handled. OOIDA is also maintaining a page of frequently asked questions on the certification rule. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine Michigan roads plan would nearly double diesel taxA bipartisan bill package was unveiled this week at the Michigan statehouse to raise $1.04 billion for transportation infrastructure. The plan includes a first-of-its-kind initiative to eliminate the state’s excise tax on fuel and replace it with a wholesale tax. The funding package of nearly 20 bills closely follows a plan outlined by Gov. Rick Snyder to lawmakers during the fall. To address a $1.4 billion shortfall simply to maintain the current system, the Republican governor called for lawmakers to increase transportation funding and improve roads, bridges and public transit. Among the dramatic reforms sought to Michigan’s transportation user fees is an initiative to eliminate the state’s 19-cent-per-gallon gas tax and 15-cent-per-gallon diesel tax in favor of a new wholesale tax on fuel. Shifting tax collection to the wholesale price would result in a 28.3-cent tax, raising $541 million – more than half the amount sought to benefit infrastructure throughout the state. A provision in the bill would ensure the wholesale tax rate does not rise or fall more than 1 percent each year. The sales tax applied to fuel purchases would not be affected by the change. Snyder has said the change is a more viable long-term funding approach. The percentage tax would tie revenues to the pump price as it rises and falls instead of linking it to fuel consumption. Another $500 million would come via increases to vehicle registration fees. The fees would be determined on a percentage basis instead of a flat rate. Weight-based fees for commercial vehicles would increase 25 percent. The funding package includes a bill to create a regional transit authority in southeast Michigan. Another bill authorizes regional authorities to ask voters to approve an option regional registration fee for transit. Democratic leaders said the funding package shows that transportation needs are front and center on the legislative agenda. “This bipartisan package of bills is a good place to start the discussion about what we need to do to maintain our infrastructure now and prepare for our state’s future needs,” House Democratic Leader Richard Hammel of Mt. Morris Township said in a statement. Also addressed in the package are the Michigan truck drivers and many other residents who are resistant to paying more for transportation. A common complaint is the mismanagement of revenue already available. Plans include a requirement for transportation agencies in the state to follow certain “best practices” to help ensure all road projects are competitively bid. State law now requires the process solely for projects in excess of $100,000. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine House lawmakers promise highway bill next weekTransportation leaders in the U.S. House of Representatives say they’ll introduce a long-term surface transportation bill next week. Rep. John Mica, R-FL, chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said financing for the bill will be tied to American energy production. “America needs to rebuild its infrastructure but I do not support what appears to be the President’s plan to finance that effort by downsizing the military,” Mica said in a statement following President Obama’s State of the Union address on Tuesday, Jan. 24. “Next week Republicans will introduce a long-stalled major transportation measure – killed two years ago by the President – that will be financed in part by increased American energy production, creating jobs and lowering energy costs.” During the State of the Union address, President Obama said the U.S. must rebuild crumbling infrastructure and focus on clean energy. “Building this new energy future should be just one part of a broader agenda to repair America’s infrastructure,” he said. “So much of America needs to be rebuilt. We’ve got crumbling roads and bridges.” Obama said he will sign an executive order in the next few weeks to cut red tape on construction projects. He then unveiled his plan to help pay for infrastructure. “In the next few weeks, I will sign an executive order clearing away the red tape that slows down too many construction projects,” he said. “But you need to fund these projects. Take the money we’re no longer spending at war, use half of it to pay down our debt, and use the rest to do some nation-building right here at home.” While the president said America should focus on clean energy and domestic natural gas production, he did touch upon the issue of oil drilling. “I’m directing my administration to open more than 75 percent of our potential offshore oil and gas resources. Right now, American oil production is the highest that it’s been in eight years. That's right - eight years. Not only that - last year, we relied less on foreign oil than in any of the past sixteen years.” Obama is not saying that drilling and infrastructure funding should be linked, however. Congressional Democrats have their own ideas for supplementing the federal Highway Trust Fund. U.S. Rep. Nick Rahall, D-WV, ranking member of the House T&I Committee, released a statement saying the U.S. should close loopholes in current “Buy America” regulations. “America used to lead the pack when it comes to manufacturing and innovation, but now we are packing up entire industries and sending them overseas to our foreign competitors,” Rahall stated. “We are no longer buying just cheap trinkets from China. We are now literally buying bridges and major transportation infrastructure. Loopholes in ‘Buy America’ regulations are being manipulated as much as the Chinese manipulate their own currency.” On the Senate side, Democrats and Republicans in the Environment and Public Works Committee came together on Nov. 9, 2011, to pass a two-year surface transportation bill – or at least the framework for a bill under their jurisdiction. Other committees are drafting their provisions to add to the bill including a financing title. Courtesy of LandLine Magazine
|
Arizona Business & MoneyThe Swift and Knight Transportation companies on Wednesday reported profits that beat analysts' estimates for the past quarter, largely in part to growing commerce. Swift stock prices were among the leading gainers of the day, rising 73 cents, or about 7 percent, to $10.73 in regular trading. Its share price rose as high as 12 percent. The two Phoenix-based trucking companies reported strong freight volumes during the holiday season, which is consistent with a freight-tonnage report this week from the American Trucking Association in Arlington, Va. The association said its seasonally adjusted for-hire truck tonnage climbed 10.5 percent in December compared with a year before -- the largest over-the-year gain since July 1998. November tonnage was up 6 percent. Bob Costello, chief economist for the trucking association, said he was surprised at the magnitude of the gain. "Not only did truck tonnage increase due to solid manufacturing output in December, but also from some likely inventory restocking," he said. Trucking is often a barometer of the economy because it represents two-thirds of all domestic freight, including manufactured and retail goods, he said. Swift, the largest carrier in North America, reported fourth-quarter net income of $36.8 million, or 26 cents a share, compared with a loss of $48.3 million, or 66 cents a share, a year earlier. Excluding one-time charges , Swift earned 29 cents a share. Analysts had estimated 24 cents a share. A 4 percent increase in trucking revenue and improved pricing helped Swift boost overall quarterly revenues 10 percent to $860.7 million, compared with a year earlier. Another factor that helped was the company's continued reduction in its "deadhead percentage," or the amount of time trucks travel empty without bringing in revenue. That percentage fell to 11.7 percent in the fourth quarter, compared with 12.3 percent in the year-ago quarter. Knight Transportation Inc. said its net income grew 7.6 percent to $17.5 million, compared with $16.2 million a year earlier. The per-share profit increased 14 percent to 22 cents, compared with 19 cents in the fourth quarter of 2010. Including an accounting adjustment, net income grew 30 percent to 22 cents, and net income grew 22.7 percent to $17.5 million. Analysts had estimated per-share earnings of 21 cents. Knight's share price grew 2.9 percent to $16.61 on Wednesday. Excluding fuel surcharges, revenues for the quarter rose 14.6 percent to $181 million. With fuel surcharges, they grew 19 percent to $224 million. For the year, diluted earnings for Swift ended at 65 cents, compared with a loss of $1.98 in 2010. And for Knight, they reached 74 cents, an almost 2 percent increase from a year before. Mercedes-Benz Financial Services Receives Over $50 Million in Payments Via Mobile ChannelsCustomers quickly adapt to the convenience of making loan and lease payments anytime, anywhereSince introducing its iPhone app giving customers the convenience to make payments anytime, anywhere just over two years ago, Mercedes-Benz Financial Services (MBFS) has received over $50 million in payments via mobile channels -- and the number is growing. In October 2009, Mercedes-Benz Financial Services became the first captive auto finance company to introduce an app for customers with iPhones to enable them to make monthly payments. That innovation was quickly followed in early 2010 with the launch of a mobile version of mbfs.com, accessible from all smart phone devices and capable of accepting monthly payments on loans and leases. In 2011, the first full year that both mobile channels were available, the company received $38 million in payments. In mid-2010, Mercedes-Benz Financial Services became one of the first companies in the world to adapt the consumer-oriented Apple iPad to a business application by making the MBFS existing dealer portal, MB Advantage, available on the iPad, thus introducing mobile capability to more than 350 Mercedes-Benz dealerships in the U.S. "A significant portion of our customer base quickly adopted mobile technology as a preferred method of making payments and communicating with us," Michael Kanzleiter, Senior Marketing Manager for Mercedes-Benz Financial Services, told members of the International Motor Press Association today at its monthly meeting in midtown Manhattan. The company's mobile payment channels, including the apps for iPhone and iPad and the mobile website, experienced a 127% growth rate in 2011, reflecting customers' rapid adoption and the growing acceptance of doing business via mobile channels. In fact, nearly 40% of the total retail portfolio of 511,000 customers is managing their accounts with MBFS online, self-service methods including mbfs.com, the My MBFS app, and the mobile website. Kanzleiter said Mercedes-Benz Financial Services is enhancing the existing app for the iPhone and iPad, enabling customers to obtain monthly payment estimates on new Mercedes-Benz vehicles, and even request a quote from a local dealer. Customers will select their Mercedes-Benz model, choose a retail or lease product and term, and the app will provide general payment information. Customers can provide an email address and phone number to request additional information from a local dealer. Mercedes-Benz Financial Services Mobile Strategy Chronology
PR Court sets new FMCSA deadline on recorder motionA federal court has granted an extension to Feb. 21 for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to answer a cease-and-desist motion regarding truck electronic onboard recorders. On Jan. 24, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued a Feb. 6 deadline for the FMCSA’s response to the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association’s motion. The agency requested a 30-day extension and OOIDA countered with seven days. The court allowed an extra 15 days. Last August, the association successfully appealed the agency’s 2010 recorder rule. That regulation would have required EOBRs for all trucks used by a carrier with a greater than 10 percent rate of noncompliance with hours-of service-regulations in any single compliance review The court determined that “the rule cannot stand because the agency failed to consider an issue that it was statutorily required to address.” The Truck and Bus Safety and Regulatory Reform Act of 1988 “requires the agency to ensure that any such device is not used to ‘harass vehicle operators.’” Since that decision, OOIDA has stated agency officials pursued “a policy of encouraging motor carriers to adopt the use of EOBRs without first promulgating regulations ensuring that such devices are not used to harass drivers.” The association included an October news report to illustrate FMCSA’s policy direction in exhibits submitted to the court. Sen. Lautenberg: Heavier trucks don’t belong on our roadwaysSen. Frank Lautenberg, D-NJ, a long-time opponent of increased truck sizes and weights on federal highways, says now is not the time to put additional strain on the nation’s infrastructure. Lautenberg is urging House leadership not to include provisions for increased truck size and weight in the next highway bill. “Larger and heavier trucks also mean more wear and tear on our infrastructure. This point is critical, considering the backlog on highway and bridge maintenance in the current budgetary climate,” Lautenberg wrote to House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman John Mica of Florida and committee ranking member Nick Rahall of West Virginia on Thursday, Jan. 26. Mica’s committee plans to introduce its version of the surface transportation reauthorization bill next week. An authorization bill covers policy and funding along with provisions for motor carrier safety. Shippers and big-business trucking have attempted for years to increase truck limits beyond 80,000 pounds. If changes to truck size and weight are to be considered by Congress, the authorization bill is the likely avenue. “As you finalize your surface transportation reauthorization legislation, I ask you to not include any provision allowing larger and heavier trucks on our highways,” Lautenberg stated in the letter. “Thank you for your consideration of this critical issue.” The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association opposes measures that go beyond current laws regarding truck size and weight. The Association says Lautenberg’s position on this issue is spot on. “We appreciate Sen. Lautenberg’s attempt to throw cold water on the divisive language that we hear could be included in the House version of the highway bill,” OOIDA Director of Government Affairs Laura O’Neill said. “We often don’t see eye-to-eye with the senator on many issues pertaining to trucking, but in this aspect, the senator is spot on if the committee is considering putting an increase in the bill. “It is disappointing to say the least that the voice of small businesses may be ignored and an increase to truck size and weights could be included,” O’Neill said. “Certainly, such a provision would be a potential road block to the passage of a bill.” Courtesy of LandLine Magazine Recommendation to MRB: use your headsThe Medical Review Board is a tricky group to follow. The MRB, a panel of appointees that make medical recommendations to FMCSA, didn’t meet for most of 2010.
They followed that up, however, with serious action late last year, and look to make 2012 their most aggressive year yet.
Appointed by the U.S. Transportation Secretary, board members make sweeping announcements, yet they still can’t regulate or mandate anything. Their recommendations are forwarded to FMCSA, which may adopt, ignore or amend anything forwarded their way by the MRB.
As Land Line pointed out in December, the Medical Review Board’s members appear to be in a hurry to implement serious changes that unnecessarily affect the livelihoods of tens of thousands of experienced truckers.
Now the MRB wants FMCSA to crack the whip even harder on truckers.
The changes they’re poised to consider for formal adoption include automatically disqualifying drivers who a) report excessive sleepiness “during the major wake period while driving” OR; b) experience a crash associated with falling asleep, OR; c) experience a single-vehicle crash.
“With a single vehicle crash, there should be a presumption the driver experienced fatigue at the wheel,” notes from an MRB subcommittee meeting state.
That’s right – hit a deer, bump into that illegally parked truck or dumpster in the dark corner of a truck stop or shipping yard and the MRB wants you outta trucking. That’s how aggressive and out of line the MRB has become.
These recommendations will be examined in upcoming MRB meetings, maybe even as early as February.
At the MRB’s joint meeting with MCSAC in December, several doctors guffawed over the lack of sleep doctors often operate under. They may have laughed about the high number of hours they work at a time, and how much doctors rely on coffee – but this isn’t something to joke about.
As Land Line has pointed out, medical errors by physicians and hospitals kill a minimum of 40,000 Americans annually – eclipsing fatalities involving commercial trucks.
Yet these doctors – even ones who serve on the MRB – don’t log any sleep schedule, or turn over their work schedule to police officers.
Though the MRB’s sleep apnea recommendation to FMCSA is just that – a recommendation – let’s hope the board’s doctors use their heads when making suggestions about just who should or shouldn’t be behind the wheel of commercial vehicles.
Because, let’s face it: recommending FMCSA treat truckers as sleep deprived maniacs is starting to look pretty hypocritical for Medical Review Board members.
Courtesy of LandLine Magazine Ontario court hears trucker’s challenge of speed-limiter lawOwner-operator Gene Michaud’s constitutional challenge of the Ontario, Canada, law that requires heavy trucks to be equipped with speed limiters is now in the hands of a judge. Michaud’s attorney David Crocker of Toronto presented oral arguments to the Ontario Court of Justice over a two-day period ending Monday, Jan. 23. “We argued that the speed-limiter legislation, that being the amendment to the Highway Traffic Act … violated Gene Michaud’s rights under Sec. 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to have his security interest protected,” Crocker told Land Line on Tuesday following the proceedings in Welland, Ontario. “We argued that speed limiters and the speed-limiter legislation put him at risk because it created a variance between his speed and the flow of traffic,” Crocker said. “That variance was itself dangerous, and we had expert opinions to support that.” Expert opinions included an affidavit from Julie Cirillo, retired assistant administrator for the U.S. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. She stated in the document that speed limiters prevent heavy trucks from operating within the flow of traffic and would, therefore, increase the likelihood of accidents. Michaud, an OOIDA member from St. Catharines, Ontario, received a citation from a provincial truck inspector on June 19, 2009, five months after the provincial speed-limiter law took effect. The inspector found Michaud’s limiter to be working, but it was at 68 mph. Michaud testified that he believes having his truck restricted to 65 mph is too slow and too dangerous for operating on U.S. highways where he routinely runs. Michaud’s argument against the province also includes a rebuttal of claims that speed limiters reduce harmful greenhouse gas emissions. “We argued that even if there was some minor emissions savings which resulted from the speed-limiter legislation, it was so small as to be irrelevant,” Crocker said. The province, represented by attorney Michael Dunn of the Ministry of the Attorney General for Ontario, also presented arguments on Monday. The province stands by its initial justification for the law that limiting the speed of the commercial vehicles improves safety and reduces harmful emissions. After arguments closed, Justice of the Peace Brett A. Kelly announced that he will reveal his decision on June 6. Separate case pending in court OOIDA Member Lee Ingratta of Gravenhurst, Ontario, received a citation in July 2009 after “refusing” to allow an inspector to check his truck computer for a working speed limiter. Ingratta says he did not refuse access but merely asked the inspector to sign a waiver to accept responsibility for damages caused by the computer hookup. Ingratta, a former computer technician, says he doesn’t trust the devices or the process used by inspectors to check for speed limiters. Ingratta won his initial case in traffic court when a judge sided with him. The province filed an appeal and won, but the judge in the case ordered a new trial. That trial begins in March. Source:Courtesy of LandLine Magazine |
- Idaho State Police still investigating deadly chain-reaction crash on U.S. 95
- E-ZPass savings for commuters next month, but what about truck drivers?
- Applications due Feb. 1 for OOIDA Mary Johnston scholarships
- North Carolina trucking company president pleads guilty to lying
- Truckers fear and loathe possible toll rates in the Mojave Desert
- Charging Batteries in Cold Weather










